<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lesson plan on my iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyesright.speedofcreativity.org/2008/05/18/lesson-plan-on-my-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyesright.speedofcreativity.org/2008/05/18/lesson-plan-on-my-iphone/</link>
	<description>a team blog written by aspiring Christ followers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Fryer</title>
		<link>http://eyesright.speedofcreativity.org/2008/05/18/lesson-plan-on-my-iphone/#comment-10982</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Fryer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyesright.speedofcreativity.org/?p=59#comment-10982</guid>
		<description>David: While I certainly can speak for myself in terms of those I think would best lead the United States in the next four years, I wouldn't want to attempt to speak for Christ on this issue. I think we see a lot of problems when groups and individuals claim to speak for Jesus in politics. The entire title of "The Christian Coalition" is problematic. What if I disagree with one of the platform points of the coalition? Am I not a "Christian" in that case? As Rob Bell points out in his excellent book &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Velvet-Elvis-Repainting-Christian-Faith/dp/031026345X" rel="nofollow"&gt;"Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith"&lt;/a&gt; (which our men's group just finished studying a few weeks ago) we get into trouble when we start calling people and groups "Christians" instead of focusing mainly on being Christ-followers.

I know these distinctions were not explicitly part of your comment, but those thoughts come to mind. I certainly can (&lt;a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/wfryer" rel="nofollow"&gt;and have&lt;/a&gt;) written posts about my own political opinions and beliefs, but I shy away from the idea of trying to write or say "This is what Jesus believes" with respect to politics.

Jesus was a revolutionary but he was not a political leader. He did not fit the mold of the messiah which contemporary Jews were looking for, because he did not come as a military leader and conquering king. I certainly agree with the idea that as followers of Christ, we should be vocal and active in politics. We are in the midst of a culture war, and we should not stand by passively. I think we should be careful, however, to not speak beyond our authority. I don't have authority to definitively say how Jesus would vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: While I certainly can speak for myself in terms of those I think would best lead the United States in the next four years, I wouldn&#8217;t want to attempt to speak for Christ on this issue. I think we see a lot of problems when groups and individuals claim to speak for Jesus in politics. The entire title of &#8220;The Christian Coalition&#8221; is problematic. What if I disagree with one of the platform points of the coalition? Am I not a &#8220;Christian&#8221; in that case? As Rob Bell points out in his excellent book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Velvet-Elvis-Repainting-Christian-Faith/dp/031026345X" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith&#8221;</a> (which our men&#8217;s group just finished studying a few weeks ago) we get into trouble when we start calling people and groups &#8220;Christians&#8221; instead of focusing mainly on being Christ-followers.</p>
<p>I know these distinctions were not explicitly part of your comment, but those thoughts come to mind. I certainly can (<a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/wfryer" rel="nofollow">and have</a>) written posts about my own political opinions and beliefs, but I shy away from the idea of trying to write or say &#8220;This is what Jesus believes&#8221; with respect to politics.</p>
<p>Jesus was a revolutionary but he was not a political leader. He did not fit the mold of the messiah which contemporary Jews were looking for, because he did not come as a military leader and conquering king. I certainly agree with the idea that as followers of Christ, we should be vocal and active in politics. We are in the midst of a culture war, and we should not stand by passively. I think we should be careful, however, to not speak beyond our authority. I don&#8217;t have authority to definitively say how Jesus would vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Stone</title>
		<link>http://eyesright.speedofcreativity.org/2008/05/18/lesson-plan-on-my-iphone/#comment-10967</link>
		<dc:creator>David Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyesright.speedofcreativity.org/?p=59#comment-10967</guid>
		<description>Wes, (nothing to do with iPhone)

In our moment of political Presidential bliss, you should make a post here...

Who would Jesus vote for if he were here today? 

I certainly don't think he would be passive in this matter.  I think he would certainly have the kingdom in mind.  

I just thought it might be a great topic. Have a great day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes, (nothing to do with iPhone)</p>
<p>In our moment of political Presidential bliss, you should make a post here&#8230;</p>
<p>Who would Jesus vote for if he were here today? </p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t think he would be passive in this matter.  I think he would certainly have the kingdom in mind.  </p>
<p>I just thought it might be a great topic. Have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
